Introductory university-level calculus, linear algebra, abstract algebra, probability, statistics, and stochastic processes.
Change of variables in multiple integrals
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
Sometimes, we need to integrate a function on a bounded closed region other than a rectangle or a region sandwiched by two curves. Even when the bounded closed region is simple, it may still be difficult to integrate a function on it. We may calculate the integral in such cases by changing the integration variables.
Consider two planes, the plane and plane. Suppose we have a map
defined on a neighbor of the bounded closed region in the plane. Suppose maps to the bounded closed region in the plane (Figure 1):
Figure 1. Change of variables by the mapping .
We further assume the following:
is injective.
The functions and are of class , and at an arbitrary point , we have That is, the determinant of the Jacobian of is non-zero in .
Let be a continuous function on . By composing with , we have the function
on .
Theorem (Change-of-variables formula for multiple integrals)
The following holds:
where
Proof. Omitted. (Too technical and too long). ■
Instead of the proof, we give a hand-waving explanation of how the above change-of-variables formula works. Consider the situation as in Figure1 where the region is rectangular, and is of some general (i.e., not easily describable) shape. We would like to integrate a function on .
First, let us partition the rectangle into smaller rectangles (Figure 2, left). Accordingly, the region is also partitioned into corresponding smaller subregions (Figure 2, right).
Figure 2. Partitioning and .
Figure 3. A close-up view of the highlighted regions in Figure 2.
Each small rectangular subregion is mapped to a subregion (Figure 3). Each is a region surrounded by the pieces of four curves (Figure 3, right). Now, let be the bottom left vertex of the small rectangle and define . The integral of over is calculated as follows. Let be the area of the region .
Remark. In the following, indicates the area of the set . □
The integral is approximated by the sum
where each represents the signed volume of the shape with base and (signed) height . As the partition is refined, the sum on the right-hand side converges to the integral on the left-hand side.
On the other hand, the right-hand side of the formula (Eq:chvar) can be approximated as
To compare (Eq:intD) and (Eq:intE), we need to compare the areas of and . Note that it suffices to show that
The difficulty here is we don't know how to measure the area of , . On the other hand, we know that (as is rectangular). To simplify the problem, we approximate the region by a parallelogram spanned by the two vectors
We further approximate each component of these vectors by using the first-order Taylor expansion (Figure 4):
where , , , .
Figure 4. Approximating the region by the parallelogram .
Thus, consider the parallelogram spanned by the following two vectors:
We can approximate the area of by that of (Fig. 4), that is,
Now, recall the fact that the area of the parallelogram spanned by and is given by . Therefore, the area of is given by
Thus, if we take the limit of infinitesimally fine partitions of , the sums in (Eq:intD) and (Eq:intE) will converge to the same value that is .
Example. Let us calculate where is the square region surrounded by the following four lines
Observe that the four vertices of this square are , , , and (Draw a figure!). Based on this, any point in the square can be represented as a linear combination of the two vectors and :
Thus, consider the change of variables
Then, the square region on the plane is mapped to .
The Jacobian determinant is
Thus, we have
□
In general, an integral over the parallelogram region with vertices , , and can be transformed to an integral over by the linear transformation
In such a case, we have
Another important change of variables is the polar coordinates:
Then, the Jacobian determinant is
Example. Given
where , let us find
Using the polar coordinates , we have , and the ranges of and are and , respectively. Noting that , we have
Defining the birth process Consider a colony of bacteria that never dies. We study the following process known as the birth process , also known as the Yule process . The colony starts with cells at time . Assume that the probability that any individual cell divides in the time interval is proportional to for small . Further assume that each cell division is independent of others. Let be the birth rate. The probability of a cell division for a population of cells during is . We assume that the probability that two or more births take place in the time interval is . That is, it can be ignored. Consequently, the probability that no cell divides during is . Note that this process is an example of the Markov chain with states \({n_0}, {n_0 + 1}, {n_0 + 2}...
Generational growth Consider the following scenario (see the figure below): A single individual (cell, organism, etc.) produces descendants with probability , independently of other individuals. The probability of this reproduction, , is known. That individual produces no further descendants after the first (if any) reproduction. These descendants each produce further descendants at the next subsequent time with the same probabilities. This process carries on, creating successive generations. Figure 1. An example of the branching process. Let be the random variable representing the population size (number of individuals) of generation . In the above figure, we have , , , , We shall assume as the initial condition. Ideally, our goal would be to find how the population size grows through generations, that is, to find the probability for e...
In mathematics, we must prove (almost) everything and the proofs must be done logically and rigorously. Therefore, we need some understanding of basic logic. Here, I will informally explain some rudimentary formal logic. Definitions (Proposition): A proposition is a statement that is either true or false. "True" and "false" are called the truth values, and are often denoted and . Here is an example. "Dr. Akira teaches at UBD." is a statement that is either true or false (we understand the existence of Dr. Akira and UBD), hence a proposition. The following statement is also a proposition, although we don't know if it's true or false (yet): Any even number greater than or equal to 4 is equal to a sum of two primes. See also: Goldbach's conjecture Next, we define several operations on propositions. Note that propositions combined with these operations are again propositions. (Conjunction, logical "and"): Let ...
Comments
Post a Comment