Fourier series of piece-wise smooth functions

Our goal in this post is to prove the following:

  • If f is ``piece-wise smooth,'' then the (complex) Fourier series of f converges uniformly to f.
Note that the condition in this theorem does not involve the Fourier coefficients of f; hence, it is more direct. That is, we can tell if the Fourier series of a function converges uniformly from the property of the function alone.



Let C2Ï€m be the collection of all functions of class Cm such that all derivatives up to the m-th order have period 2Ï€

We say a function f is piece-wise smooth if f∈C2π0 (i.e., continuous) and f′∈R2π2 (i.e., the derivative is square-integrable, not necessarily continuous).

In the following, we will consider the complex Fourier series:
f∼∑k=−∞∞ckeikx
where the Fourier coefficients are
ck=12π∫−ππf(x)e−ikxdx.

Lemma (Bessel's inequality)

If f∈R2π2, then
(eq:bessel)2π∑k=−∞∞|ck|2≤∫−ππ|f(x)|2dx.
Proof. Let Sn(x)=Sn[f](x)=∑k=−nnckeikx where ck are the complex Fourier coefficients of f.
∫−ππ|f(x)−Sn(x)|2dx=∫−ππ(f(x)−Sn(x))(f(x)―−Sn(x)―)dx=∫−ππ|f(x)|2dx−∫−ππ(∑k=−nnckeikx)f(x)―dx−∫−ππf(x)(∑k=−nnc―ke−ikx)dx+∫−ππ(∑k=−nnckeikx)(∑k=−nnc―ke−ikx)dx.
Using the definition of ck,  and orthogonality of {eikx}, we have
∫−ππ|f(x)−Sn(x)|2dx=∫−ππ|f(x)|2dx−2π∑k=−nn|ck|2−2π∑k=−nn|ck|2+2π∑k=−nn|ck|2(eq:fSn)=∫−ππ|f(x)|2dx−2π∑k=−nn|ck|2.
But the left-hand side is non-negative. Thus, 
∫−ππ|f(x)|2dx≥2π∑k=−nn|ck|2.
The right-hand side is monotone increasing as n→∞, and the left-hand side does not depend on n. Therefore, (eq:bessel) holds. ■

Remark. Since ∫−ππ|Sn(x)|2dx=2π∑k=−nn|ck|2, we have
(eq:Snlef)∫−ππ|Sn(x)|2dx≤∫−ππ|f(x)|2dx.
â–¡

Theorem 

If f∈C2π0 and f′∈R2π2, then the (complex) Fourier series of f converges uniformly to f.
Proof. We use the following theorem (see Complex Fourier series):
  • (*) If the series of Fourier coefficients of f converges absolutely, then the Fourier series S[f] converges uniformly to f at continuous points. 
Let γk denote the complex Fourier coefficients of f′:
f′∼∑k=−∞∞γkeikx.
Since f′∈R2π2 by assumption, by applying the above lemma to f′, we have
(eq:gammaineq)∑k=−∞∞|γk|2<+∞.
Integrating by parts,
2Ï€ck=∫−ππf(x)e−ikxdx=1ik∫−ππf′(x)e−ikxdx=2Ï€ikγk   (k≠0).
That is,
ck=1ikγk   (k≠0,k∈Z).
By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,
∑k≠0|ck|=∑k≠01|k||γk|≤∑k≠01k2∑k≠0|γk|2.
Noting that ∑k=1∞1k2<+∞ and (eq:gammaineq), the right-hand side is finite. Thus, ∑k≠0|ck|<+∞. Therefore, by the above Theorem (*), S[f] converges uniformly to f. ■

The following corollary is the main result of this post:

Corollary

If f∈C2π1, then the (complex) Fourier series of f converges uniformly to f.
Proof. f∈C2π1 implies f∈C2π0 and f′∈R2π2. ■

Corollary (Parseval's equality)

If f∈C2π0 and f′∈R2π2, then
(eq:parseval)2π∑k=−∞∞|ck|2=∫−ππ|f(x)|2dx.
Proof. Since S[f] converges uniformly to f, the left-hand side of (eq:fSn) converges to 0. Thus, the above equality holds. â– 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Birth process

Branching processes: Mean and variance

Informal introduction to formal logic