Improper multiple integrals

Consider integrating a function f(x,y) over a region D which may not be bounded or closed. In the case of a univariate function, this corresponds to the improper integral where we took the limits of the endpoints of a closed interval. In the case of multiple integrals, we adopt the notion of a "sequence of regions."



Consider a sequence of regions {Kn} where each Kn is a subset of R2 that satisfies the following conditions:

  • (a) K1K2 KnKn+1.
  • (b) For all nN, KnD.
  • (c) For all nN, Kn is bounded and closed.
  • (d) For any bounded closed set F that is included in D (i.e., FD), if n is sufficiently large, then FKn
    • In other words: for all bounded closed FD, there exists some NN such that, for all nN, if nN then FKn.
Such a sequence {Kn} is called an approximating sequence of D. Let f(x,y) be a function on D. Furthermore, suppose the approximating sequence {Kn} of D satisfies the following
  • (e) For all nN, Knf(x,y)dxdy exists.
Then, {Kn} is called an approximating sequence of D on which f(x,y) is integrable.

Definition (Improper multiple integral)

f(x,y) is said to be improper (Riemann-)integrable if there exists at least one approximating sequence {Kn} of D on which f(x,y) is integrable such that the limit
I=limnKnf(x,y)dxdy
exists, and the limit I does not depend on the way the approximating sequence {Kn} on which f(x,y) is integrable is constructed. In this case, we say the improper multiple integral
I=Df(x,y)dxdy
converges.
Remark. Basically, this definition means that the sequence (of real numbers) {Knf(x,y)dxdy} converges to the same value whatever the approximating sequence {Kn} is (as long as f(x,y) is integrable on all Kn). □
However, there are infinitely many possibilities for the approximating sequence of D, so checking the convergence of the integral for all of them is impossible in practice. What should we do, then?

Lemma (Improper integral of a non-negative function)

Let f(x,y) be a function such that f(x,y)0 for all (x,y)D. Suppose there exists an approximating sequence {Kn} of D on which f(x,y) is integrable. Let In=Knf(x,y)dxdy and assume that I=limnIn exists. Then, for any approximating sequence {Kn} of D on which f(x,y) is integrable, the limit I=limnKnf(x,y)dxdy exists and I=I.
Proof. Let us define
In=Knf(x,y)dxdy,In=Knf(x,y)dxdy.
Since f(x,y) is non-negative and {Kn} and {Kn} are increasing sequences, we have
I1I2InIn+1I1I2InIn+1
That is, the sequences {In} and {In} are monotone increasing. Since {In} converges to I, we have I=supnIn in particular.
For any nN, we can choose (why?) a sufficiently large mN such that KnKm. Thus, InImI, which implies that the sequence {In} is bounded above. Since {In} is also monotone increasing, the limit I=limnIn exists (Remember the monotone convergence theorem?). Since I=supnIn, we have
(Eq:I'leqI)II.
For any nN, we can choose a sufficiently large mN such that KnKm. Thus, InImI. Therefore we have
(eq:IleqI')II.
By (Eq:I'leqI) and (Eq:IleqI'), we have I=I. In other words, the value of the limit I does not depend on the choice of the approximating sequence {Kn}. ■

Corollary (Improper integral of a non-positive function)

Let f(x,y) be a function such that f(x,y)0 for all (x,y)DSuppose there exists an approximating sequence {Kn} of D on which f(x,y) is integrable. Let In=Knf(x,y)dxdy and assume that I=limnIn exists. Then, for any approximating sequence {Kn} of D on which f(x,y) is integrable, the limit I=limnKnf(x,y)dxdy exists and I=I.
Proof. Let g(x,y)=f(x,y). Then we can apply the above Lemma. ■

Example. Given D={(x,y)x0, y0}, let us find the improper multiple integral
Ddxdy(1+x2)(1+y2).
First, let us define Kn={(x,y)0xn, 0yn} for each nN. Then, {Kn} is an approximating sequence of D.
In=Kndxdy(1+x2)(1+y2)=0ndx1+x20ndy1+y2=[arctanx]0n[arctany]0n=(arctann)2.
Noting that limnarctann=π2, we have
limnIn=(π2)2=π24.
Therefore,
Ddxdy(1+x2)(1+y2)=π24.

Example (Gaussian integral). The following integral is called the Gaussian integral and is of great practical importance.
ex2dx=π.
Let's prove this equality.
Since ex2 is an even function, ex2dx=20ex2dx. To calculate the latter integral, we consider the following double integral
(Eq:gaussian)Dex2y2dxdy where D={(x,y)x0, y0}.
Let Kn={(x,y)x0, y0, x2+y2n2} be an approximating sequence of D. Using the polar coordinates, we have
In=Knex2y2dxdy=0nrer2dr0π2dθ=π2[12er2]0n=π4(1en2).
Since limnIn=π4, the integral in (Eq:gaussian) exists and is equal to π4.

On the other hand, using another approximating sequence of D
Dn={(x,y)0xn, 0yn},

the same integral can be calculated as
Jn=Dnex2y2dxdy=Dnex2ey2dxdy=0nex2dx0ney2dy=(0nex2dx)2.
Noting ex2y2>0, by the above Lemma, Jn converges to the same value as In does, that is, π4. Since ex2 is positive, we have
0ex2dx=π2,
and hence,
ex2dx=π.

Example (Gamma function). The gamma function Γ(s) is defined as
Γ(s)=0exxs1dx.
Thus,
Γ(12)=0exx12dx.
Let x=t2, then
Γ(12)=0exx12dx=20et2dt=π.

Theorem (Γ(n12))

For any nN,
Γ(n12)=(2n3)!!2n1π.
Here, n!!=n(n2)(n4)1 and (1)!!=1 (These are called double factorials).
Proof. Exercise. ■

The beta function is defined as
B(p,q)=01xp1(1x)q1dx.
The following theorem connects the gamma function with the beta function.

Theorem

For all p,q>0,
(Eq:BG)B(p,q)=Γ(p)Γ(q)Γ(p+q).
Proof. For each nN, let us define the following sequences of regions:
Kn={(x,y)x0, y0, x2+y2n2},Dn={(x,y)0xn, 0yn}
as approximating sequences of the first quadrant
D={(x,y)x0, y0}.
We consider integrating the function
f(x,y)=4ex2y2x2p1y2q1
on D using {Kn} and {Dn}.

First, using {Kn} and polar coordinates,
Knf(x,y)dxdy=40ndr0π2rer2(rcosθ)2p1(rsinθ)2q1dθ=(20ner2r2p+2q1dr)(20π2(cosθ)2p1(sinθ)2q1dθ)=(0nettp+q1dt)(20π2(cos2θ)p1(sin2θ)q1cosθsinθdθ)Γ(p+q)B(p,q).
Next, using {Dn},
Dnf(x,y)dxdy=(20nex2x2p1dx)(20ney2y2q1dy)Γ(p)Γ(q).
Thus, 
Γ(p+q)B(p,q)=Γ(p)Γ(q).
Dividing both sides by Γ(p+q)(0), we have the desired equality (Eq:BG). ■

Exercise. Prove
0π2sinaθcosbθdθ=Γ(a+12)Γ(b+12)2Γ(a+b+22)
for a>1 and b>1. □

Example
0π2sin5θcos6θdθ=Γ(3)Γ(72)2Γ(132)=2!5!!23π11!!25π=235!!11!!=81197=8693.

Example. Let us express the following integral in terms of the gamma function:
0xb11+xadx
where a>0 and b>0.

Let t=11+xa. Then x=(1tt)1a, dx=1a(1tt)1a1dtt2.
0xb11+xadx=1a10tba(1t)ba1dt=1aB(1ba,ba)=1aΓ(1ba)Γ(ba)Γ(1)=1aΓ(1ba)Γ(ba).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Birth process

Branching processes: Mean and variance

Informal introduction to formal logic