Fields

The sets Q, R, and C behave in a similar manner. They all have addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division that satisfy certain properties. This common behavior is summarised in the notion of fields. Thus, Q, R, and C are examples of fields.




Definition (Field)

A set F is called a field if it is endowed with binary operations + and and satisfies the following axioms.
  1. F is closed under + (closure): a,bF, a+bF.
  2. + is commutative: a,bF, a+b=b+a.
  3. + is associative: a,b,cF, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c.
  4. There is an additive identity element 0 with respect to +: 0F such that aF, a+0=a.
  5. There is an inverse of each element with respect to +: aF,aF such that a+(a)=0.
  6. F is closed under (closure): a,bF, abF.
  7. is commutative: a,bF, ab=ba.
  8. is associative: a,b,cF, a(bc)=(ab)c.
  9. There is a multiplicative identity 1 w.r.t. : 1F such that aF, a1=a.
  10. There is an inverse of each element except 0 w.r.t. : aF{0},a1 such that aa1=1.
  11. Distributive law: a,b,cF, a(b+c)=ab+ac.
We usually call + and ``addition'' and ``multiplication'', respectively.

Remark. Multiplication may be denoted by or ×; or these symbols may be omitted (as in ab for ab).  □

Example
  1. Q is a field.
  2. R is a field.
  3. C is a field.
Example
  1. N is not a field. Because 0N. Even if we adopt the convention that 0N, the additive inverse of 1 is 1N.
  2. Z is not a field. Because the multiplicative inverse of 2 is 1/2Z.
Example. Let A={1,2,3}. A is not closed under the usual addition and multiplication of numbers. For example, 2+3=5A and 2×3=6A. □

What's nice about defining the field is that we can prove some properties common to all fields so that we don't have to repeat the same proof for each of, say, Q, R and C.

Proposition 

Let F be a field. We have the following:
  1. For all fF, f0=0.
  2. For all h,kF, if hk=0, then h=0 or k=0.
Proof. 
  1. By the definition of 0 (additive identity), for any f we have f0=f(0+0). By the distributive law, f0=f0+f0. Add the inverse of f0 on both sides, (f0)+f0=(f0)+(f0+f0). By the associativity of addition, (f0)+f0=((f0)+f0)+f0=0+f0. By the definitions of an additive inverse and 0, 0=f0. And we are done.
  2. Suppose hk=0. If h=0, we are done. Suppose h0. Then its multiplicative inverse h1 exists. Then we have, by using Part 1, h1(hk)=h10=0. But we have h1(hk)=(h1h)k(associativity of multiplication)=1k(definition of multiplicative inverse)=k(definition of multiplicative identity). Thus, k=0.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Birth process

Branching processes: Mean and variance

Informal introduction to formal logic