e=2.718: Napier's constant

We have defined the constant known as Napier's constant e in a previous post, as e=exp(1) where exp(x) is the inverse of log(x)

See also: log and e

Here we provide an alternative definition of this constant. That is,

e=limn(1+1n)n.

For this definition to be valid, we need to show that the sequence {an} defined by

an=(1+1n)n

converges.



Example. The first several terms of the above sequence are:

a1=2,a2=2.25,a3=2.370,a4=2.441,a5=2.488,a10=2.593,a100=2.704,a1000=2.716,

Lemma

The sequence {an} defined above is monotone increasing.

Proof. We show that an<an+1 for all nN.

By the Binomial Theorem, we can write

an=k=0nskk!

where

sk=n(n1)(nk+1)nk=nnn1nnk+1n=1(11n)(1k1n).

Similarly,

an+1=k=0n+1tkk!

where

tk=1(11n+1)(1k1n+1).

For each i=1,2,,k1, we have

1in<1in+1

so that

sk<tk (k=1,2,,n).

Therefore, for n1,

an=k=0nskk!<k=0ntkk!<k=0ntkk!+tn+1(n+1)!=an+1.

Lemma

For all nN, the following holds:

2(1+1n)n<3.

In particular, the sequence {an} defined by an=(1+1n)n is bounded.

Proofa1=2 and {an} is strictly monotone increasing. Therefore an2 for all nN. Using sk defined in the previous lemma,

sk=1(11n)(12n)(1k1n)1

for k=1,,n1. Therefore

an=1+1+s22!+s33!++snn!1+1+12!+13!++1n!.

Noting that n!=123n>1222=2n1 for n3,

an1+(1+12+122++12n1)=1+(212n1)<3

The next theorem follows immediately from these lemmas.

Theorem

The sequence {an} defined by an=(1+1n)n converges.

Now we can define

e=limn(1+1n)n=2.71828.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Birth process

Branching processes: Mean and variance

Informal introduction to formal logic