Let and be functions that are continuous on and differentiable on . Suppose that for all . Then, there exists a such that
Proof. Note that the function satisfies the conditions of the mean value theorem. Thus, there exists a such that
Since by assumption, it follows that . Now let us define
Then is continuous on and differentiable on . Moreover,
Therefore, by Rolle's theorem (Theorem 10.6), there exists a such that . Then
so that, since ,
■
Theorem L'Hôpital's rule (1)
Let and be differentiable functions on . Assume that the following conditions are satisfied.
For all , .
The right limit exists.
Then, the right limit exists and
Furthermore, Condition 1 may be replaced with
Proof. For convenience we set so that and are defined on . Assume conditions 1, 2, and 3 hold.
By condition 1, and are continuous on . For any , and are continuous on and differentiable on . By condition 2, for all , . Thus, by Cauchy's mean value theorem, there exists a such that
as and, by condition 3, exists. Therefore also exists and
Next, consider the case when
(1')
holds instead of condition 1 above.
Let us define the constant by
By the definition of the right limit, for any , there exists a such that implies .
Since , there exists such that implies .
Let and . By Cauchy's mean value theorem, for all , there exists a such that
By rearranging this equation, we have
where
Here, and are finite constants, and converges to a finite value (by condition 3). Hence, by condition 1' (), . In other words, for any , there exists a such that implies .
Let . By Eq. (eq:rx), we have
implies
Therefore the right limit exists and it is equal to . ■
Remark. The case of left limits can be proved similarly. Then, L'Hôpital's rule (2) should be easily proved. (Exercises) □
Corollary (L'Hôpital's rule (3))
Let and be differentiable functions on the open interval that satisfy the following conditions.
For all , .
The limit exists.
Then, the limit also exists and
Furthermore, condition 1 may be replaced with
(1')
to have the same conclusion.
Proof. We prove the case when and condition 1 holds.
For the open interval , this can be replaced with any real number greater than . Therefore, without losing generality, we may assume .
Let . As , . By conditions 1 and 2,
and
From
and
we have
so that, by condition 3, the right limit exists. Therefore, by L'H\^opital's rule (1), we have the limit
Defining the birth process Consider a colony of bacteria that never dies. We study the following process known as the birth process , also known as the Yule process . The colony starts with cells at time . Assume that the probability that any individual cell divides in the time interval is proportional to for small . Further assume that each cell division is independent of others. Let be the birth rate. The probability of a cell division for a population of cells during is . We assume that the probability that two or more births take place in the time interval is . That is, it can be ignored. Consequently, the probability that no cell divides during is . Note that this process is an example of the Markov chain with states \({n_0}, {n_0 + 1}, {n_0 + 2}...
Generational growth Consider the following scenario (see the figure below): A single individual (cell, organism, etc.) produces descendants with probability , independently of other individuals. The probability of this reproduction, , is known. That individual produces no further descendants after the first (if any) reproduction. These descendants each produce further descendants at the next subsequent time with the same probabilities. This process carries on, creating successive generations. Figure 1. An example of the branching process. Let be the random variable representing the population size (number of individuals) of generation . In the above figure, we have , , , , We shall assume as the initial condition. Ideally, our goal would be to find how the population size grows through generations, that is, to find the probability for e...
In mathematics, we must prove (almost) everything and the proofs must be done logically and rigorously. Therefore, we need some understanding of basic logic. Here, I will informally explain some rudimentary formal logic. Definitions (Proposition): A proposition is a statement that is either true or false. "True" and "false" are called the truth values, and are often denoted and . Here is an example. "Dr. Akira teaches at UBD." is a statement that is either true or false (we understand the existence of Dr. Akira and UBD), hence a proposition. The following statement is also a proposition, although we don't know if it's true or false (yet): Any even number greater than or equal to 4 is equal to a sum of two primes. See also: Goldbach's conjecture Next, we define several operations on propositions. Note that propositions combined with these operations are again propositions. (Conjunction, logical "and"): Let ...
Comments
Post a Comment